Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 10/2004

Lockbox

WAUSAU's Evolving Remittance Solutions [NACHA Payments]

[This is just one of my series of posts from the NACHA Payments 2008 conference in Las Vegas.]

WAUSAU's Evolving Remittance Solutions [NACHA Payments]
WAUSAU logo 
Kathy Strasser and I discussed the ways that WAUSAU is continuously evolving in order to meet the growing demand for paper to electronic payment solutions via remote capture, remittance, image/item processing and enterprise content management. Strasser is responsible for WAUSAU's remittance products, so naturally our conversation was focused on lockbox solutions.

WAUSAU has 48% market share across the retail, wholesale and "wholetail" (blend of one-to-one scanable retail-like items and more complex, non-scanable wholesale-like items) segments and is the leading source of ARC transactions (paper checks received at the lockbox and converted to ACH payments for settlement). With a long history of retail lockbox expertise, WAUSAU acquired DMP Payment Systems a year ago in order to expand its wholesale services. And, in its effort to meet the ever-evolving needs of its customers it announced a partnership with ClairMail to offer lockbox services via the mobile channel (more on that here).

The emphasis at WAUSAU is on providing solutions that act as an integrated, value-add extension to the corporate customer's receivables system, with workflow, exception processing, and document imaging to support core lockbox payment processing features. I cannot emphasize enough the value of offering a single platform for exception processing regardless of how the transaction is received for processing or settled.

WAUSAU offers remittance solutions via banks but also sells directly to corporations with volumes great enough to justify in-house or outsourced lockbox services. WAUSAU has optimized its solutions to meet the needs of industry verticals such as insurance, property management, utilities and is redoubling its efforts to support healthcare. The company will continue to build out industry specific capabilities through partnerships.

>> Return to index of my posts from NACHA Payments 2008

Payments2008

ClairMail - Secure, Efficient, 2-way Mobile Banking & Payments [NACHA Payments]

[This is just one of my series of posts from the NACHA Payments 2008 conference in Las Vegas.]

ClairMail - Secure, Efficient, 2-way Mobile Banking & Payments [NACHA Payments]

Clairmail_logo_2

ClairMail enables two-way customer interaction via mobile phones, regardless of the type of phone and the wireless network, using the phones existing software and standard features, including email and SMS messaging, mobile web and native client applications. No new mobile phone software is required.

The big news from ClairMail at the NACHA Payments is that it is partnering with WAUSAU to extend the WAUSAU remittance platform to the mobile channel. ClairMail Mobile Lockbox technology enables an alet message sent to the payer's mobile phone with details such as payee name, dollar amount, and due date. The payer replies to message to instantly pay the bill from their mobile phone. If the biller is fortunate (and the consumer not particularly adept at cash management) the payee may respond immediately to the alert, rather than paying on the due date.

Regardless of the desire or need for consumers to pay their bills from their mobile phone, I do think that mobile alerts for corporate payments make a lot of sense. Because the payment amounts are larger and the stakes of missing a payment are often higher, corporate payments are particularly suited for mobile transactions - they have the added benefit of being discrete, enabling corporate finance managers to quickly and quietly respond to urgent payment matters from meetings, on the road, and off hours. In particular, positive pay confirmations, wire payment confirmations, and lockbox exception handling are well suited to the ClairMail solution.

One particularly cool feature overcomes the awkwardness of entering a URL and username + password combination into a mobile browser. Using the ClairMail solution the customer can send a text message "go" to their financial institution and receive in reply a dynamic link. Upon loading the dynamic URL the mobile user enters an encrypted session and only has to enter a PIN rather than their username/pw pair.

>> Return to index of my posts from NACHA Payments 2008

Payments2008

ChoicePay's New Multichannel Electronic Payment Platform that Extends Remittance Solutions for Small & Mid-sized Billers [NACHA Payments]

[This is just one of my series of posts from the NACHA Payments 2008 conference in Las Vegas.]

ChoicePay Offers a Powerful, new Multichannel Electronic Payment Platform that Extends Remittance Solutions for Small & Mid-sized Billers [NACHA Payments]

Choicepay_logo

I am really excited about a new service from ChoicePay that will allow remittance vendors and financial institutions selling to small and mid-sized billers to quickly and easily add electronic payments to their lockbox offering. Elspeth Bloodgood, demo'd for me how ChoicePay has taken its multi-channel payment platform (kiosk, call center, walk-up retail, IVR, and online) and repackaged it for quick deployment via white-label solutions. The biller customer will receive a single stream of payment data (either via their remittance provider, or via ChoicePay) combining all payment channels and supported with Business Objects reporting capability.

The rapid provisioning of this tool blew me away. The solution is not only completely modular, but the onboarding process is a series of workflow-driven screes with validation alerts built in. The biller enters preferences to match its business process and adding a new payment method is remarkably simple. In the background, the parameterized ChoicePay engine drives the necessary web services. The ease of implementation means that small and mid-sized banks can offer a comprehensive payment solution to businesses with as few as 1000 transactions a month. ChoicePay will train the resellers implementation and product teams to deploy and support the solution.

The online interface can be customized to match the branding of the biller (adding a logo, modifying colors, etc. is as easy as formatting this blog - even easier). The solution is multi-lingual and the interface for a one-time payment is the same as for a recurring payment (you simply check a box to make the one-time payment recurring and can elect to turn off paper billing).

It's very cool. I'll be monitoring the uptake of this solution over the coming months and will post follow ups.

>> Return to index of my posts from NACHA Payments 2008

Payments2008

eGistics - Scalable, Flexible Hosted Document Management [NACHA Payments]

[This is just one of my series of posts from the NACHA Payments 2008 conference in Las Vegas.]

eGistics - Scalable, Flexible Hosted Document Management [NACHA Payments 2008]

Egistics_logo
I had an opportunity to speak with Bob Lund, CEO of eGistics, and discuss the company's transition from a payments-centric archive to a more holistic document-centric model, encompassing not just images of check payments but the accompanying remittance and correspondence, as well as other key business documents,  thereby enabling its financial institution and payment processing vendor customers to better serve the needs of billers and retailers.

Through its hosted business model, eGistics provides a scalable, secure, redundant document image archive to support payments applications such as retail and wholesale receivables processing, check processing/Check 21,medical payments processing (EOBs) and records management, and loan processing and management. Because it is a hosted solution, customers do not need to make a capital investment and simply pay a one-time fee to load each image. Subsequent viewing of the images is free, thus customers can predict their archive costs based on transaction volume rather than usage of archived images.

I was particularly impressed with eGistics workflow and business rules capability. Customers can define escalation procedures for the timely review and resolution of exception items. For example, a brokerage that receives a payment a their lockbox with a letter requiring exception handling can provide email addresses for employees that should be alerted with a link to the item for review. And if the initial contact does not respond, a second employee will be contacted. Similarly, if the deadline for resolution of a particular item is approaching, additional employees may be contacted.

eGistics is in partnership with ChoicePay (more on their latest offerings here) and US Dataworks, as well as other payment firms and many of the top financial institutions. The company has already gained traction within the healthcare industry and is well positioned to continue to serve the growing needs of that vertical.

>> Return to index of my posts from NACHA Payments 2008

Payments2008

NACHA Payments 2008 - Forte Blog Index

Payments2008

I took a slight detour en route home from Las Vegas (via Death Valley and Yosemite - spectacular!) and just finished writing up my observations.

This year is the largest NACHA Payments conference to date (they get bigger and bigger each year) with nearly three thousand attendees. There were sessions devoted to ACH, check electronification, card solutions, global payments, corporate payment solutions and the payments industry over all. Over the course of the conference I attended eight sessions and had one-on-one conversations with seven vendors. I also participated in a press conference with the NACHA Leadership.

General Sessions & Overall Observations

Summary & NACHA Leadership Interview

Keynote/Peter Raskind, National City (general session)

Break Out Sessions

International Payments
ACI Worldwide & BofA

Global Remote Deposit Capture
Goldleaf Financial and Global Concepts/McKinsey

Corporate Mobile Banking
Celent & Wells Fargo

XML All Stars
BofA, JPMorgan Chase, GE Corporate Treasury, Upper Midwest ACH Association, ABN AMRO Bank

B2B Outlook
Federal Reserve, AFP, Cal State AAA, Costco

Remittance for Wires
Federal Reserve, CHIPS, SWIFT

NACHA's B2B Strategy
NACHA, Celent

How To Turn Your Online Bill Pay Expense into a Revenue Stream
eCom Advisors

Vendors

Bob Lund/eGistics

Elspeth Bloodgood/ChoicePay

Joe Salesky/ClairMail

Rob Peyton/OB10

Kathy Strasser/Wausau

Danne Buchanan/NetDeposit

David Peterson/Goldleaf

Distributed Capture Panel Discussion (TAWPI Conference)

[I am in Las Vegas for the TAWPI Payments in Transition conference – these are my notes from one of the sessions. An index of all of the sessions and links to the rest of my notes is here. - EMc]

Distributed Capture Panel Discussion
Wally Vogel, President, Creditron
Mary Hockridge, Executive VP, NetDeposit
Brandon Kunz, Director of Product Strategy, Enterprise Payments Division, Goldleaf Financial Solutions
Charles W. Kelly Sr., formerly Senior VP, Huntington National Bank
Jon Reneslacis, Director, Product Management, VSoft

Moderator: Mark Brousseau, Brousseau & Associates

[program blurb] This interactive panel discussion features insight and advice from prominent solutions providers.  During the session, attendees will gain a better understanding of the latest technologies and strategies for remote deposit capture, payments automation and receivables management. The main focus of the discussion will be to detail the most important technologies shaping the market and the key trends and innovations that are changing the way information is captured, processed, managed and delivered 

My notes/observations:

It was great to re-connect with Mary Hockridge - we worked together on a distributed capture prototype for Wells Fargo nearly 10 years ago when she was with Carreker. Back then everyone thought we were crazy because banks and vendors were concentrating on consolidated, huge item processing sites and we wanted to capture images in remote branches. It was hard to find vendors who understood what we were trying to accomplish but Carreker and Panini got it and embraced it. Now Mary is at NetDeposit riding high on the remote capture wave and is a panelist this morning.

Q - How does your organization approach the distributed capture space?

Mary, NetDeposit - technology solution provider for check electronification products: remote deposit and image cash letter – either licensed and ASP. Resell scanners to bank customers and their end users (ordering, fulfillment, taxes, etc.), provide back room services for banks that want to outsource, and offer end to end marketing/sales tools for RDC to help customers’ product introductions succeed.

Wally, Creditron - End user remittance and wholesale lockbox. We are focused on what the check represents for the AR/cash application process. Scalability and flexibility to extend AR.

Brandon, Goldleaf - software for financial services, from small/community to top 10 banks. Recently acquired Alogent. Focus is on payments and deposit automation. Branch back counter, front counter, kiosk, ATM, all on one platform. automation rather than capture alone.

Jon, VSoft - privately held company. Doubled employees. Acquired a bank data center recently (former customer) to offer in house and ASP service. Mostly community/smaller banks + some top 25 and non-bank customers (gov't).

Charles, Huntington - Regional bank, 54 million in assets. Will share experience from transition due to acquisition of Sky Bank (which had in house service provider) vs. Huntington (which had an outsource model) - and lessons learned during re-evaluating the two strategies.

Q – Mary, where do you think we are in the evolution of RDC and DC

Mary, NetDeposit – Clearly RDC has gone through fast evolution from inception to adoption. Moving well into the mainstream. Analysts predict that by end of 2009, there will be 1 million remote capture installations live, e.g. sold scanner, trained, setup, and scanning deposits. The wild card is small biz and micro biz adoption. Huge numbers, but can service providers and banks, adapt their pricing, service model to match small biz (smaller budgets). Further differentiation of vendors to address niche industries (property management, insurance). Also non FI players (ISOs that sell merchant card products, and software companies that provide AR software for specific industries, direct adoption by insurance, broker/dealer with significant needs such that they go straight to technology provider, by-passing banks.

Q - Brandon what do you think the big story is for distributed capture?

Brandon, Goldleaf– The adoption of RDC hasn't gone as anticipated - thought full service applications were more likely than self-service applications. Makes sense that branch back counter was first, now moving to front counter/teller. Transportation and accuracy benefits. But eclipsed by remote deposit at companies of all sizes, rather than just top companies. Great opportunity for everyone.

Q - Jon, what is story in community bank market?

Jon, VSoft – Dominated by fear, maintaining traditional idea of being more nimble, closer to customer. Big banks have volume, can buy into new territories. Community banks feel pressure to protect and provide intimacy for customers – small businesses and sole proprietors. Use technology to enhance not erode customer intimacy.

Q - Charles, what about larger (mid-size) banks?

Charles, Huntington – go beyond large customers, even small biz. Target high net wealth customers with desire to make deposit from home office (coolness factor counts for them). Link with cash vault - virtual vault - or to capture remittance as well as payment. Or capture other key documents and store securely. Leverage platform investment and link to other products and services that the bank offers.

Q - Wally, what is the interest among companies you are talking to?

Wally, Creditron – Over the last 25 years, traditionally higher volume means a better business case. But with RDC the cost of trip to the bank amortized across a very small number of items, making the biz case look even better. Moving away from bricks and mortar, but how to bring client close to you if visiting the branch less frequently? Provide value add using information. Integrate deposit solution into QuickBooks, Great Plains, etc. 

Q – I am struck by how few lockbox providers are not offering distributed capture to wholesale lockbox customers, particularly B2B implications.

Wally, Creditron – It is starting to happen. Concern surrounding security and control. Lockbox operations management is nervous about extending scanning outside their controlled environment to remote site at customer location.

Q - Goldleaf, how much interest is there in distributed payments capture?

Today in branch, can accept deposit (payment) at teller line, scan payment and payment coupon. Read both and parse, validate data account number, determine principle vs. interest, and create a complete solution. How to apply to remote deposit as well? Add logic so that when scanning check, recognized that we've seen one just like this last month – same RTN, account number – and we credited it to Wally. So this must be a payment from Wally, too. Automate data population (acct number, etc). Smaller billers may not have coupons, so there may be more work to standardize.

Q Charles?

Charles, Huntington – We did remote deposit lockbox in 2005. Provider needs to interface with lockbox (or item processing system that looks like a lockbox). Company with software suite addressing RDC needs to integrate with lockbox vendor. But how do vendors determine who they want to allocate precious development dollars to interface with? [EMc comment – this where we can better standards to move payment and remittance data from one system to another, avoiding the need for custom interfaces.]

Mary, NetDeposit – The challenge is in enabling edit routines, intelligence of lockbox system in remote capture at client location. Customer has intelligence of business; lockbox software had check processing optimization expertise. Remittance capabilities are hard to control/optimize at customer location vs. the highly controlled lockbox workflow environment. There are usability trade-offs and automation tradeoffs The less that customer does, the less likely that here will be edit rule exceptions when the transactions reach the lockbox. By utilizing SaaS it is possible to distribute capture to corporate and have centralized - solid - process for exceptions. Allow end user to make corrections, repair their own transactions.

Jon, VSoft – I am a former lockbox product manager. For now, put aside customer that has a lockbox and is only trying to deal with a few strays that wind up at corporate office. But what about the customer that is debating whether to have a wholesale lockbox or handle myself, cannot compete with the mail float advantage of a lockbox. Scanning needs are greater than what a small, desktop scanner can address.  More appropriate for nuisance payments.

Q – Charles, how did you sell this?

Charles, Huntington – The company had a lockbox, but still received payments at corporate office. ROI was calculated for 9 months, but actually paid off in 30 days. Allowed customer to get huge payments (delivered to their office) deposited more quickly and got funds availability a day ahead. Most customers don't appreciate or understand mail float. Float savvy customers will want a lockbox in the right geography. Remote capture is appropriate for desk float. Appropriate for certain industries, e.g. healthcare offices.

Q – Billers: we aren't check processors. We outsource to you for a reason.

Charles, Huntington – A typical medical practice has one person does all office tasks: receivables, ordering, payments, organize meetings, etc. Help them save time, avoid extra errands.

Jon - vsoft - Why should I pay you when I am doing the work? Sales challenge is to find the value for each individual customer. Of a universe of ten possible RDC benefits, 1-2 benefits are most applicable for each customer. For instance, we had a customer whose office manager was really sloppy with the ten-key. They got $8 charges from the bank for out of balance deposits on a regular basis. They were sold on a remote capture solution that requires transaction balancing.

Q – billers are looking for a solution that drives receivables. Might be coupon, invoice - need that data yet we are using check scanners. How can industry address need to scan supplemental documents? Some customers waiting until there is a solution that addresses remittances.

Jon, VSoft - Initially treasury was excited about fast check deposit. Now moving on to the data integrity, and more value-add: Is it a local install, is it ASP? How do I administer users? Merchants are not item processors or document imagers. They have other responsibilities.

Brandon, Goldleaf - merchant customer with two scanners (one for check one for doc?). Who are we expecting to take on responsibilities of trained lockbox personnel? Will technology take up the slack as capture moves to customer locations?

Q – Wally, how do you respond? Biz model needs documents plus checks…

Wally, Creditron – Yes, customers are capturing both check and remittance data. What is the need for the data? The AR system needs it to apply the payments to the customer accounts. Ideally the solution is linked to cash application batch screen. Simply add a scan button to the screen they are already using - integrated with their usual process.

Q - Why can't we use page scanners instead of check scanners?

Mary, NetDeposit - Page scanners do not include MICR reading. So rely on optical recognition. NACHA rules have limitations if you use a device that does not recognize MICR. But the rules are fuzzy. As consumer capture becomes more prevalent, quality of the image becomes the primary issue. Skew, etc. Everyone downstream is subject to the quality of the image that is captured. Need affordable, accessible scanner price tag for heavy users as well as small, micro biz , down to consumer. Package in such a way that it is a natural purchasing decision for customer. In the early days, company treasurers agreed to pay $1000 for scanners up front. Not likely for other market segments.

Q – Wally, are you comfortable using page scanners for check?

Wally, Creditron - Not with current technology. [Mark interjects] It happens today, using OCR to read MICR. Leading vendors are doing it – [Wally continues] … but you asked me if I am comfortable with it. Different in a high volume shop with trained operators. In a small environment, capture is harder to control.

Brandon, Goldleaf - flatbed scanners have benefit over deposit automation because of remittance automation. But invoice is a whole different situation, with non-uniform format. Need more programming. For the deposit itself, you can use the image. Vendors are thinking about it (holy grail) because it makes deposit automation pervasive on a much wider scale. Comfortable in some situations. FIs using it today, but the non-MICR model has a different risk profile (have assets on deposit, know their customer very well).

Q - Billers have accused vendors of dragging feet on combined check + page scanning.

Brandon, Goldleaf - device support is fairly easy with only a few major providers of check scanners. But there is a wider range of page scanner providers. TWAIN provides some consistency. Do you want to optimize the current workflow (for which subset of customers) and integrate to QuickBooks or are you going to re-evaluate the paradigm and have deposit itself drive the transaction?

Q - Jon, what about your customers?

Jon, VSoft – I’d rather talk about consumer capture than billers – I have an intense internal debate about consumer capture. I love the idea from a technology perspective, challenge of integrating flatbed, the opportunity for consumers. I want to do it! But I get very few checks: $2 refund, $25 from my grandmother - how will banks make money on a consumer remote deposit product? Banks don't want to have anything to do it with it. Credit unions think vendors are too late. But where is the business case?

Charles, Huntington - he's right. No biz case on typical consumer. How many checks do you receive? Very few. But for high net worth customer the bank struggled to develop a product, but the customer demanded it! Developed product, established process/rules to govern check storage, etc. Some niche markets (talent management firms dealing with celebrities, for example). Vary by customer niche. But the delivery mechanism is key.

Brandon, Goldleaf - What options does the customer have with a $2 check? Mail to bank using a 42 cent stamp, drive to bank with gas at $4/gallon, or just throw it out? Value to consumer is huge (convenience) and huge opportunity to attract new deposit customers. Once BofA or WF introduces it, consumer remote deposit will take off.

Jon, VSoft - But until the scanner can give me a $20 bill I will go to ATM. A small dollar check is not urgent. I'll carry it around until I go to the ATM next. Banks by their nature are risk adverse; selling this to a consumer is hard. Who sells - teller? They aren't savvy. Hard to train sales force to sell RDC to customer: treasury, IT, receivables. Who can address consumer questions about availability? Technology interfaces?

Audience comment: no business case, occasional usage, huge support costs. Ouch!

Q – Will BOC meet expectations?

  • Mary, NetDeposit - yes
  • Wally, Creditron - no
  • Brandon, Goldleaf – [didn’t catch his response]
  • Jon, VSoft - yes, but expectations should have been much smaller
  • Charles, Huntington - [didn’t catch his response]

Q - What will be the key differentiator in RDC?

  • Mary, NetDeposit - reporting
  • Wally, Creditron - integration with accounting/receivables systems
  • Brandon, Goldleaf - tech has to do work, flexibility to integrate
  • Jon, VSoft - matching to most prevalent uses of customers
  • Charles, Huntington - open technology

Q - Are there too many RDC providers?

  • Mary, NetDeposit - yes
  • Wally, Creditron - too many similar providers
  • Brandon, Goldleaf - yes
  • Jon, VSoft - no, focused on separate segments
  • Charles, Huntington - no

Q - Biggest mistakes banks make in implementing RDC?

  • Mary, NetDeposit – not enough training of users, back office folks
  • Wally, Creditron - central office rolling out standard, without taking into account varying processes, needs of their office locations/divisions
  • Brandon, Goldleaf - not involving everyone (stakeholders within customer and bank)
  • Jon, VSoft - training
  • Charles, Huntington - not understanding full scope of solution

Q - What will be the big story in 18 months?

  • Mary, NetDeposit - greater risk management, integration with authorization of checks for e-tailers/POS customers.
  • Wally, Creditron - Remote deposit of cash (that's what our customers are asking for)
  • Brandon, Goldleaf - intraday settlement, from 1-2 days to 1-2 hours
  • Jon, VSoft - Businesses’ treasury departments understand least cost routing, and the best way to clear. But what about slower way to clear? They are interested in slowing down disbursements!
  • Charles, Huntington - Technology emerges to allow integration of RDC in market segments we haven’t even considered.

>> Return to index of TAWPI conference sessions

Image Integrity - A Critical Component of Check Electronification (TAWPI Conference)

[I am in Las Vegas for the TAWPI Payments in Transition conference – these are my notes from one of the sessions. An index of all of the sessions and links to the rest of my notes is here. - EMc]

Image Integrity—A Critical Component of Check Electronification
Kerry Atha, Director of Product Development, Viewpointe
Perry Bailey-Kopp, Group Vice President, Check Production Support, SunTrust Banks, Inc.

Financial institutions are continuing their rapid adoption of check electronification, raising new concerns about maintaining image integrity—ensuring that images and their associated metadata files match. Should mismatches occur, financial institutions could face considerable risks with significant financial and customer trust/public relations repercussions. Speakers will present the challenge today’s financial institutions are facing in maximizing image integrity, a critical component of quality assurance; explore the financial and PR/customer satisfaction ‘fallout’ that occurs when mismatches happen; and detail the actions FIs and the industry must take to preserve the integrity of image presentment and storage.
[presentation]

My notes/observations:

Image integrity = correct match between image itself and its corresponding meta data. (Vs. Image quality which has to do with the image itself and was the subject of another session this morning.)

Exponential growth in image exchange in the last year. Thousands of banks, not just the big ones. Volume data from ECCHO and Federal Reserve (slides 3–4). Anticipate that 2008 will bring tipping point (more electronic checks processed than paper checks).

Kerry Atha, Viewpointe spoke first: 

Ability to "share" vs. exchange item when both participants are in the same exchange.

Usability Metrics

  • Image quality - characteristics of the image
  • Image usability - legibility and completeness of info
  • Image integrity - wrong image associated with transaction data (can be a privacy issue if wrong check image is displayed to customer)

Initial industry focus was on image quality. How to translate subjective qualities to objective measurements that everyone can agree on, and then develop software tools to check quality of images.

Image integrity is the focus of conversations between image exchange partners (particularly at beginning). They made an effort to understand one another’s processing environments, efforts made to ensure quality of images and integrity of data files. But as image exchange grows and more and more end points are added how do you evaluate the quality of the incoming images and data files?

Image quality software checks 15 parameters. But only 3 (too light, too dark, piggy-back) actually affect pay/no-pay decision. 90% of suspect items are false positives. Thus the risk tool introduces a new level of risk as operators viewing thousands of images that are actually okay are more likely to accidentally clear/approve images with genuine issues. 

Perry Bailey-Kopp, SunTrust spoke next:

  • 4.3 million items per day
  • 82% in clearings as image (36% growth in 2007)
  • 60% transit items cleared as image (39% growth in 2007)
  • 2.8 million items average daily exchange volume
  • 1st bank to implement image exchange with the Fed
  • 1st bank not blocking any RT for exchange
  • 1st bank to receive controlled disbursement via image
  • In house for ICL and paper capture
  • 5.3 million items via online deposit (remote deposit capture)

Banks are selling distributed capture products. Uncertain of quality of images and data-image integrity from remote deposit end points. Rely on Viewpointe to do the quality review for SunTrust. Leave images at Viewpointe and access the data only. Access images for Day 2 processing, as necessary.

Fed submitting images, too. Same challenges with remote capture sources. Quality not as good as Viewpointe, although Fed is working on it. They have a lot of end-points feeding into their system, too.

Your archive is as critical as your posting applications. If archive is corrupt (mis-matches) then your DDA data is corrupt, too. Must be very careful.

Is it necessary to subject all items to IQA/IIA (Image Quality assessment, Image Integrity assessment testing) each day? NO. 3890 reader sorter does a good job. When there is a jam, run IQA/IIA on items 30 items before, 30 items after. Run test against all rejects. Thus, only 2% of items at SunTrust subject to IQA/IIA. So far, only 7 mismatched items - all due to operator responsible for image quality review (same operator!).

Image Cash Letter (ICL) - customer scans checks and generates their own image deposit file. SunTrust runs all ICL files they receive through IQA/IIA because have no idea of imaging, process control within their customers’ operations.

Distributed Capture - SunTrust is moving toward a distributed model to replace their proof operation. [Note – this is the strategy that I worked on for Wells Fargo nearly ten years ago – way ahead of its time; alas it wasn’t implemented due to the merger with NorWest.] Distributed capture utilizes smaller scale equipment and CAR/LAR, replacing painful Image POD and its inherent problems ("I got my butt kicked by Image POD" - Perry). Power-encode turned out to be difficult: keying worked well, balancing worked well, but could not encode fast enough and get paper out of the bank. But this time around, not having to move the paper (due to Check 21), distributed capture is the way to go. Per SunTrust, if we need a paper copy we can print an IRD.

In 2 years, transportation will be the highest cost factor of check processing. You don't want to be the last guy processing paper!

Image Quality and Image Integrity metrics for SunTrust:

  • Transit items = 0.19% suspect rate; 5,500 average daily
  • In clearings = 2.23% suspect rate; 24,000 daily (includes account number edits for on us items)

Administrative Returns (NCIs)

  • Sent back to Exchange Partners by STI = 0.0140% average daily volume 65
    (90% for image integrity issues)
  • Received by STI from Exchange Partners = 0.0049% average daily volume 54
    (99.9% source document issues)

Return item - wrong RTN. When this happens, someone has to find the check. Then transport it. For a $12 check?

Do bad check images (due to puppies and flowers on the check) really matter? If you can read account number, RTN, and dollar amount go ahead and process even if image is a mess. Day 2 is always looking for reason to reject - there might be a problem if we pay this. Per Perry, just pay it and find out! The sooner you do so, the more likely you are to collect your funds.

Image Quality is Out

  • Customers are looking for reasons to pay, not to reject
  • Majority of FSTC standards, not utilized for decision making: only too light, too dark, piggyback are material.

But if quality is out, Integrity is In

So many players along the way as items are passed from bank to correspondent bank and via vendors. Fed Receipt has so many end-points that there are more quality/integrity issues. Financial Institutions have confidence in their internal capture environment. But what about corporates using their own process/equipment and data from downstream banks, remote capture?

Mitigate risk: Capture bank has presentment risk, and paying bank has privacy issue. Lack of familiarity with trading/exchange partners.

Presentment compliance - ECHHO - presentment on the image (not the data). But systems are set to process on data.

Image integrity will impact future growth of image exchange; particularly as more and more end-points are added to the network.

How often does integrity issue occur? Hearing stats that range from 1 in 5000 to 1 in 50.000. Privacy breach remediation costs anywhere from $50 to $250,000 but that doesn't take into account the PR, operational impact due to damage control. No one wants to show up on the front page of the WSJ for violating customer privacy.

Banks and vendors need tool that is robust enough to catch integrity issues. Yet, impractical and expensive to evaluate every single item. How to target IQA/IIA tools to high risk items only. Systems need to have the flexibility to target a subset of items, in various locations (including at corporate customer sites).

Parameters for image integrity are much more straightforward than image quality. Difficulty is in determining how to interrogate the data and the image. But not possible to evaluate 100% of MICR data vs image. Need to optimize matching routine and logic. What subset of MICR line is enough (balance cost effectiveness vs. introducing add'l risk)? Matching and logic is not transferable from software platform to software platform. Optical character interrogation dependent on software. So it is difficult to develop a comprehensive solution.

>> Return to index of TAWPI conference sessions

Convergence of Payments & Forms Processing (TAWPI Conference)

[I am in Las Vegas for the TAWPI Payments in Transition conference – these are my notes from one of the sessions. An index of all of the sessions and links to the rest of my notes is here. - EMc]

The Convergence of Payments & Forms Processing
Mark Fairchild, Chief Technology Officer, BancTec

[program blurb] This session will explore opportunities and challenges related to the convergence of document processing and payments automation. You will hear what’s driving convergence, what we can expect in the next five years, and how to position your organization to compete.

[presentation not available]

My notes/observations:

Turning attention to the OTHER documents – not just checks. What is driving convergence of forms and payment processing, what can we expect in next 5 years, and how can your organization position itself to succeed?

Why? Competition creates differentiated services and drives down pricing. Paper payments market is commoditizing – very difficult to differentiate, evaluated on price alone. Using new services to compete more effectively: RDC, forms technology.

Businesses always trying to improve efficiency. Paper is inherently inefficient. Whether application, letter, remittance document, invoice, etc.

Regulation and Legislation play a key role in enabling process improvement– payment truncation requires regulatory change (e.g. Check 21) but on the forms side, no regulatory governance. Unless requiring legal signature.

US Adoption – Check 21 is helping to remove the document/check barrier. Now processers can treat check just like other documents that have to be imaged. No longer two separate processes for checks and other supporting docs (application form, for instance)

Technology is another key enabler – network band width, more centralized IT (web, smart client), more computing power for lower price, both color and grayscale images for forms.

Forms technology is much better in last 5 years. Structured forms (always same e.g. tax forms) vs. unstructured (e.g. letter) vs. semi-structured (invoice, you know what is on it but unsure where) – continued improvement in management and processing of forms data.

A lot of paper out there. US far more than other countries, although declining. Businesses are trying to reduce paper-based transactions. But won’t be disappearing anytime soon.

Countries with high cost of labor are early adopters of technology. Scandavia (high) vs. US (medium) vs. India (low).

Fairly consistent evolution, regardless of country:

  1. Regulation – gov’t legislation that image is okay substitute – truncation okay.
  2. Technology investment – image
  3. Volume decline – businesses prefer electronic transactions, rather than paper.
  4. Outsourcing becomes prevalent
  5. Consolidation of processors
  6. Processors develop new services in order to differentiate

Norway and Sweden. 100% outsourced, were a handful now 1-2 processors left. Other markets, mostly outsourced, 2-3 processors left. But US is different. Thousands of banks (vs. dozen on other countries), volumes are huge (30 billion vs. France 2nd largest with 4 billion). Smaller countries legislated a time line. US “enables” and relies on market forces. Fairchild predicts that US will still trend toward consolidation and outsourcing like other countries. Outsourcers, processing fewer and fewer paper payments (volumes decline) and look to form processing to add value to services offered.

Globalization continues, greater competition, new payment types.

96% of B2B invoices are paper (per AIIM)

Continued blurring of form and payment processing. More forms automation with higher degree of accuracy. Full text search archives and by product of processing. Support costs drive centrally hosted systems that support capture and key anywhere for all doc types (SaaS); remote deployment via thin client/smart client.

Extend digital horizons – digitize at first opportunity FORMS too. Move toward STP. What you cannot read through CAR, use remote key (low cost locations). Reach out to customers and suppliers (integrate in order to reduce exceptions) – push automation throughout the whole value chain, not just one segment.

Fairchild suggests that rather than silo’d AR, AP solutions, companies should develop Shared Services Operations – essentially an internal outsourcer for document automation. Benefits include

  • Aggregate volume from different parts of organization
  • Consistent approach to planning, compliance and business continuity
  • Foster best practices centrally vs. attempting to drive consistency and process improvements across a number of locations
  • Can be complementary to outsourcing (peak volume outsourced, or outsource keying only to arbitrage labor costs)
  • Similar processes in three areas: order input, receivables (payment + remittance), payables (invoices) – aggregate all docs/forms in one shared service with one archive, sufficient volume to outsource keying, one integration with ERP/host. Easier integration with supplier/customer (one interface vs. multiple)

Look for provider that can do forms + payment (eventually you will want to capture forms) where is the first opportunity to capture.

Network of common input and data entry devices – anywhere: mobile, regional headquarters, local offices, central corporate office, mail room, etc.

Shared Service Center provides central visibility, audit, control and prioritization of work.

Leverage payments technology and operational expertise to address forms. Higher levels of automation, cost savings, and new services.

>> Return to index of TAWPI conference sessions

Blogging from the TAWPI Payments in Transition Conference

I am in Las Vegas for the fifth annual TAWPI Payments in Transition conference (with the largest attendance yet: approximately 140 billers, bankers and vendors). TAWPI - the Association for Work Process Improvement - is focused on payments automation, distributed capture, and imaging/forms processing. The Federal Reserve's latest research indicates that 50% of consumer-to-business (C2B) payments are still paper. And since most B2B transactions remain stubbornly paper-based, TAWPI provides a collaborative forum for banks, corporates, and vendors seeking best practices for managing paper checks and remittances.

Recurring themes:

    • Payment data alone is insufficient without remittance/customer information. There’s been significant attention paid toward electronifying the check, but what about the supporting documentation?

    • Much of the discussion is on how to manage dual processing streams paper decreases but linger on at increasingly at lower volumes for the foreseeable future.

    • Declining check volumes increase unit costs and drive consolidation among a handful of key providers. Most (vendor and bank) representatives expect that large billers will move toward outsourcing their lockbox/remittance processing as they lose economies of scale.

    • With the emphasis on migrating from paper to electronic, it’s no wonder Check 21 is a hot topic. Almost all speakers note the wild success of remote deposit.

    • No one size fits all – solutions must vary to meet specific needs of customer segments.

      Click on the session title to view my notes/observations from each presentation:

      TUESDAY

      Keynote Address: Managing the Changing Mix of Payments
      Brian Hurdis, President, Metavante Image Solutions

      Back Office Conversion: Too Little Too Late?
      Bob Meara, Senior Analyst, Celent

      Distributed Capture: Trends, Opportunities & Challenges
      David Peterson, Executive VP, Goldleaf Financial Solutions

      The Convergence of Payments & Forms Processing
      Mark Fairchild, Chief Technology Officer, BancTec

      Payments in Transition Town Hall Meeting
      Joseph Sass, Senior Regional Manager, US Bank;
      Jay Matyas, VP & Sr. Product Manager, PNC Bank
      Steve Nugent, Director, Product Mngt., First Data Corp
      Ronald Victor, VP, Receivables Product Mngt.,JPMorgan Chase
      John Mintzer, VP, Citizens Bank
      Moderator: Mark Brousseau, Brousseau & Associates

      Business Drivers for Payment Automation
      Andrew Pery, Chief Marketing Officer, Kofax

      Check 21 Road Map: One Bank's Journey Into the 21st Century
      JR Thornton, AVP Indirect Client Services, Wilmington Trust

      Check 21: Open Discussion Among Bankers, Billers, and Vendors

      WEDNESDAY

      Keynote Address: Unlocking the Value of Your Customer Data
      Malcolm Netburn, Chairman and CEO of CDS Global

      Image Integrity—A Critical Component of Check Electronification
      Kerry Atha, Director of Product Development, Viewpointe
      Perry Bailey-Kopp, Group Vice President, Check Production Support, SunTrust Banks, Inc.

      Distributed Capture Panel Discussion
      Wally Vogel, President, Creditron
      Mary Hockridge, Executive VP, NetDeposit
      Brandon Kunz, Director of Product Strategy, Enterprise Payments Division, Goldleaf Financial Solutions
      Charles W. Kelly Sr., formerly Senior VP, Huntington National Bank
      Jon Reneslacis, Director, Product Management, VSoft